tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post3736539773728458551..comments2024-03-03T07:12:21.716-08:00Comments on Thoughts/cugetari: Cardinalul Richelieu, strategul în purpură (I)Paul Slayer Grigoriuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06111682717977908126noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post-67137937544238322882010-05-26T00:42:52.479-07:002010-05-26T00:42:52.479-07:00@ Donkeypapaus
In functie de ce criterii definest...@ Donkeypapaus<br /><br />In functie de ce criterii definesti tu 'binele' si 'raul' in conducerea unei tari ?<br /><br />"Să scoţi ţara din rahat nu este tragic, este măreţ. Ori Franţa era în rahat pe vremea aia. Să vrei binele ţării şi să te trezeşti pe eşafod, asta într-adevăr este tragic - cazul regelui Ludovic al XVI-lea."<br />Poate asa a gindit si Ceausescu inspre dusmanii poporului, si Stalin, si Hitler pe care pari sa-l consideri.<br /><br />Punctul doi : ce insemna o tara in "rahat" ? <br /><br />LRAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post-41105686625247763382010-05-11T16:14:43.217-07:002010-05-11T16:14:43.217-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Donkeypapuashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12442308981242649397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post-48961514032094400262010-05-11T11:58:39.231-07:002010-05-11T11:58:39.231-07:00No further comment.No further comment.Paul Slayer Grigoriuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06111682717977908126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post-29471345851252394102010-05-11T10:18:17.657-07:002010-05-11T10:18:17.657-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Donkeypapuashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12442308981242649397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post-92084969710690211402010-05-11T09:23:13.531-07:002010-05-11T09:23:13.531-07:00Frate, ce legatura au una cu alta? Societatea era ...Frate, ce legatura au una cu alta? Societatea era divizata, dar tuturor nobililor, indiferent daca erau catolici sau hughenoti, li s-a impus sa-si darame fortaretele care nu erau pe granita. Doar ca hughenotii au refuzat. Deci masura a fost valabila pentru toti, "la gramada", cum spui tu. Iar apoi a fost asediat La Rochelle, pe care englezii au incercat sa-l apere, dar au fost respinsi. Asta e tot. Nu se spune nicaieri in articol ca ar fi fost adusa vreo atingere Edictului de la Nantes - dimpotriva, este subliniat faptul ca protestantilor li s-a lasat libertatea religioasa.Paul Slayer Grigoriuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06111682717977908126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8097103866529758867.post-40139605648522908812010-05-11T07:41:09.757-07:002010-05-11T07:41:09.757-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Donkeypapuashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12442308981242649397noreply@blogger.com